Townsend v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc. et al
Genee Townsend |
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc. and EmployBridge (Resource MFG) |
1:2022cv00017 |
January 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Sharion Aycock |
Roy Percy |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed EmployBridge (Resource MFG) served on 3/17/2022; Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc. served on 3/17/2022. (tab) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 Notice of Assignment. (jwr) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to EmployBridge (Resource MFG), Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Mississippi, Inc. Forwarded to U S Marshal for service. (tab) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/26/2022. (yf) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Sharion Aycock and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (tab) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Genee Townsend. (tab) #1 Exhibit 1 Financial Documents) (tab). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT,, filed by Genee Townsend. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab) #2 Exhibit 1 Right To Sue Letters) (tab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.