Umfress v. American Glass Company et al
| Jerry R. Umfress |
| American Glass Company and John and Jane Does I-X |
| 1:2022cv00051 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Sharion Aycock |
| Roy Percy |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Juan Benito Hernandez on behalf of American Glass Company (Hernandez, Juan) |
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2022 11:00 AM in Judge Percy Chambers before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/2/22. (rtc)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by American Glass Company. (Hall, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John F. Hawkins on behalf of Jerry R. Umfress American Glass Company served on 4/11/2022. (Hawkins, John) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Sharion Aycock and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (tab) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to American Glass Company. E-mail to attorney for service. (tab) (Main Document 2 replaced on 3/18/2022) (tab). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2072537, filed by Jerry R. Umfress. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
