Shadburn v. Caterpillar Logistics Inc.
| Briley Shadburn |
| Caterpillar Logistics Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00155 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| David A Sanders |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal . (Norris, Robert) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE due to settlement. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Michael P. Mills on 1/25/2023. (spw)
|
| TEXT ONLY NOTICE resettingTelephonic Case Management Conference for 2/10/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders. See Docket #9 . Proposed Case Management Order and Confidential Settlement Memos due by 2/3/2023. No document attached. (cs) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/23/2023 at 9:30 AM from Amory Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders. Proposed Case Management Order and Confidential Settlement Memos due by 1/16/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 12/19/2022. (jf)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Caterpillar Logistics Inc.. (Gratz, Margaret) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (UNOPPOSED) Caterpillar Logistics Inc. answer due 12/15/2022. No further order will issued. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 11/28/22. No document attached. (def)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (UNOPPOSED) by Caterpillar Logistics Inc.. (Gratz, Margaret) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Margaret Sams Gratz on behalf of Caterpillar Logistics Inc. (Gratz, Margaret) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Louis H Watson, Jr on behalf of Briley Shadburn Caterpillar Logistics Inc. served on 11/8/2022. (Watson, Louis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert N. Norris on behalf of Briley Shadburn (Norris, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Caterpillar Logistics Inc. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jwr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2161917, filed by Briley Shadburn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jwr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shadburn v. Caterpillar Logistics Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Briley Shadburn | |
| Represented By: | Louis H Watson, Jr |
| Represented By: | Robert N. Norris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Caterpillar Logistics Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Margaret Sams Gratz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
