Neal v. United Furniture Industries, Inc. et al
Toria Neal |
United Furniture Industries, Inc. and John Does 1-10 |
1:2022cv00171 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Sharion Aycock |
Roy Percy |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Kamyrn Shelton. (jla) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Past Due Answer as to United Furniture Industries, Inc. (jla) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to United Furniture Industries, Inc. ***DISREGARD ENTRY, entered in error; see #6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Past Due Answer (jla) Modified on 1/12/2023 (jla). |
CLERK'S NOTICE re #7 Clerk's Notice of Incomplete Process; DISREGARD ENTRY; filed in wrong case (jla) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Jackson Simpson on behalf of Toria Neal United Furniture Industries, Inc. served on 12/1/2022. (Simpson, William) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Casey Langston Lott on behalf of Toria Neal (Lott, Casey) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United Furniture Industries, Inc. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2172133, filed by Toria Neal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.