Eaves v. Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al
| Zachary Eaves |
| Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, Sheriff Steve Gladney and Chief Deputy Chadd Garnett |
| 1:2023cv00011 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Sharion Aycock |
| Roy Percy |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 4/3/2023 10:00 AM in Oxford Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 2/22/23. (rtc)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Chadd Garnett, Steve Gladney, Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. (Roberson, Loyd) Modified on 2/23/2023 (jla). |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; Steve Gladney waiver sent on 1/20/2023. (Springer, Francis) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; Chadd Garnett waiver sent on 1/20/2023. (Springer, Francis) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; Oktibbeha County, Mississippi waiver sent on 1/20/2023. (Springer, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2192129, filed by Zachary Eaves. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
