Rutledge v. Prentiss County et al
Petitioner: Mike Rutledge
Respondent: Prentiss County and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Case Number: 1:2023cv00161
Filed: November 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Glen H Davidson
Referring Judge: David A Sanders
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #7 Amended / Supplement to Document, #8 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Order to Show Cause, #4 Order, Acknowledgment filed by Prentiss County, The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn)
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Directing state to Respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 1/3/2024. (tab)
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Set Answer Deadline: Prentiss County answer due 3/18/2024; The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi answer due 3/18/2024. (tab)
December 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED / SUPPLEMENT TO DOCUMENT Amendment to #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jla)
December 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order (jla)
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 12/11/2023. (tab)
November 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that petitioner is directed to submit a complete certified copy of his inmate account information for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of complaint within 21 days from date of this order. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of action. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 11/16/2023. (tab)
November 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Glen H Davidson and Magistrate Judge David Sanders. (tab)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mike Rutledge. (tab)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mike Rutledge. (tab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rutledge v. Prentiss County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mike Rutledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Prentiss County
Represented By: Jerrolyn M. Owens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Represented By: Jerrolyn M. Owens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?