Truman Arnold Companies v. Southaven Conoco, LLC et al
Truman Arnold Companies |
Southaven Conoco, LLC, Fouad Alhurebi and Jamil Bahhur |
2:2009cv00031 |
February 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Contract: Other Office |
De Soto |
David A. Sanders |
Michael P. Mills |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER denying request for order compelling ConocoPhillips Company to present representative for a deposition. Signed by David A. Sanders on 12/1/10. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-00031-MPM-DAS, 2:09-cv-00137-MPM-DAS (ncb) |
Filing 89 ORDER finding as moot (83) Motion to Quash; finding as moot (84) Motion to Quash in case 2:09-cv-00031-MPM-DAS; finding as moot (67) Motion to Quash; finding as moot (68) Motion to Quash in case 2:09-cv-00137-MPM-DAS. The plaintiffs shall serve Conoc o, Inc. with a copy of their response to the motions to quash and this order by November 17. Conoco shall file a response on or before November 22. Signed by David A. Sanders on 11/12/10. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-00137-MPM-DAS, 2:09-cv-00031-MPM-DAS (ncb, USDC) |
Filing 82 ORDER denying (68) Motion to Compel; denying (69) Motion to Compel in case 2:09-cv-00031-MPM-DAS; denying (56) Motion to Compel; denying (57) Motion to Compel in case 2:09-cv-00137-MPM-DAS. Signed by David A. Sanders on 11/5/2010. Associated Cases: 2:09-cv-00031-MPM-DAS, 2:09-cv-00137-MPM-DAS (sef) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.