Hacks Cross Development XI, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Hacks Cross Development XI, LLC
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 2:2009cv00056
Filed: March 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: De Soto
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS pending a decision on the remand motion. Signed by David A. Sanders on 4/23/09. (ncb, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hacks Cross Development XI, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hacks Cross Development XI, LLC
Represented By: Adam B. Emerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Robert Gregg Mayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?