Rimmer v. The Cleveland State Bank
Kierre T. Rimmer |
The Cleveland State Bank |
2:2011cv00256 |
December 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Delta Division Office |
Bolivar |
S. Allan Alexander |
Neal B. Biggers |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 55 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 05/15/2013. (jlh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rimmer v. The Cleveland State Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Cleveland State Bank | |
Represented By: | Arnulfo Ursua Luciano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kierre T. Rimmer | |
Represented By: | Thomas Morris |
Represented By: | Stephanie N. Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.