Knox v. PHC-Cleveland, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cynthia Knox
Defendant: PHC-Cleveland, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00166
Filed: August 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Delta Division Office
County: Bolivar
Presiding Judge: S. Allan Alexander
Presiding Judge: Glen H. Davidson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 56 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Bill of Costs. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 7/21/14. (jtm)
June 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 53 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 6/3/14. (jtm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knox v. PHC-Cleveland, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHC-Cleveland, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Knox
Represented By: Jim D. Waide, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?