Monsanto Company v. Scruggs, et al
| Monsanto Company |
| Mitchell Scruggs, Eddie Scruggs, Scruggs Farm Supply, MES, Incorporated, HES, Incorporated and MHS, Incorporated |
| Mitchell Scruggs, Eddie Scruggs, Scruggs Farm Supply, MES, Incorporated, HES, Incorporated and MHS, Incorporated |
| Monsanto Company |
| Farmland Mutual Insurance Company, Tracy Mask, Wanda R. Howell and Drexel Chemical Company |
| 3:2000cv00161 |
| September 7, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Western Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jerry A. Davis |
| W. Allen Pepper |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
853
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 794 Motion in Limine. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 8/27/2010. (pls, USDC)
|
|
Filing
837
AMENDED ORDER to reflect "Motion in Limine No. '6' 721 " in the text of said Order re 721 MOTION in Limine No. 6 and Brief in Support filed by Monsanto Company. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 8/26/2010. (pls, USDC)
|
|
Filing
833
ORDER GRANTING re 718 MOTION in Limine No. 3 and Brief in Support filed by Monsanto Company. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 8/24/2010. (pls, USDC)
|
|
Filing
731
ORDER denying 678 Motion to Reconsider Denial of Summary Judgment. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 3/03/2009. (pbs, USDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
