Truck Parts and Services, Inc. v. Truck Pro, Inc.
Plaintiff: Truck Parts and Services, Inc.
Defendant: Truck Pro, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2007cv00078
Filed: June 27, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Division Office
County: Lafayette
Presiding Judge: S. Allan Alexander
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 45 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by S. Allan Alexander on 3/4/09. (tab, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Truck Parts and Services, Inc. v. Truck Pro, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Truck Parts and Services, Inc.
Represented By: Omar D. Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Truck Pro, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph Michael Koury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?