United States of America v. $425,000.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $425,000.00 in United States Currency
Case Number: 3:2008cv00137
Filed: December 31, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Forfeit/Penalty: Other Office
County: Lafayette
Presiding Judge: S. Allan Alexander
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 28:1355 Petition for Return of Property

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Sharion Aycock recused. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 10/15/2009. (khj, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $425,000.00 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Samuel David Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $425,000.00 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?