Pearson v. Fowler et al

Plaintiff: Tonya Pearson
Defendant: Adam Fowler and Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00054
Filed: March 4, 2013
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Oxford Division Office
County: Tippah
Referring Judge: S. Allan Alexander
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. Fowler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tonya Pearson
Represented By: Laurance Nicholas Chandler Rogers
Represented By: Justin Strauss Cluck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Fowler
Represented By: Richard Lee Kimmel
Represented By: Charles Cameron Auerswald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Cameron Auerswald
Represented By: Richard Lee Kimmel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.