Norris v. Pepsi Beverages Co. et al
| Edith Norris |
| Pepsi Beverages Co., Pepsico, Inc., The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Delta Beverage Group, Inc. and John Doe |
| 3:2013cv00108 |
| April 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| De Soto |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| Sharion Aycock |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
AGREED JUDGMENT of Dismissal with Prejudice. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/1/2015. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting 76 Motion for Approval of Third Party Settlement and dismissing case without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. Parties shall notify the Court upon completion of settlement for dismissal with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/11/2015. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion to Seal or Restrict Access. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/5/2015. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 71 Joint Motion to Stay. Parties to file status reports on the docket every ninety days and notify the Court within thirty days of resolution of all issues. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/18/2014. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 33 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 10/10/2013. (bkl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
