Drakes v. T.C.C.F. et al
| Dario Drakes |
| State of Mississippi State Department of Education, P. Smith, C.O.C.F., T.C.C.F. and James Nuchring |
| 3:2013cv00133 |
| May 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| Tallahatchie |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| Neal B. Biggers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
FINAL JUDGMENT: Report and Recommendation dated August 5, 2014 APPROVED AND ADOPTED; case is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 9/25/14. (cr)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Report and Recommendation APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; California Out-of-State Correctional Facility, Mississippi Department of Education and Associate Warden James Nuchring be DISMISSED with prejudice; action proceed against the remaining defendants. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 9/24/14. (cr)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 ; the California Out-of-State Correctional Facility, the Mississippi Department of Education, and Associate Warden James Nuchring be DISMISSED from this action with prejudice; action proceed against remaining defendants. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 9/24/13. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
