Hall v. G. E. Aviation
Plaintiff: Georgella Hall
Defendant: G. E. Aviation
Case Number: 3:2014cv00128
Filed: June 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Oxford Division Office
County: Panola
Presiding Judge: Neal B. Biggers
Presiding Judge: Jane M. Virden
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 9/25/15. (jww)
December 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Extending Plaintiff's Deadline to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/31/14. (ncb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. G. E. Aviation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Georgella Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. E. Aviation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?