Great American Life Insurance Company v. Tanner et al
| Great American Life Insurance Company |
| Ava Mitchell Tanner, Alita Margaret Mitchell and Craig J. Cheatham |
| 3:2016cv00070 |
| April 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| De Soto |
| Debra M. Brown |
| Jane M. Virden |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
279
ORDER denying (249) Motion to Compel in case 3:16-cv-00070-DMB. Plaintiffs are permitted to propound discovery relevant and proportional to execution on the judgment. Defendants will have 30 days from service thereof to respond in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 2/4/21. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-00070-DMB, 3:18-cv-00023-DMB (ncb)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER denying as moot 235 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 242 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/1/2020. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-00070-DMB, 3:18-cv-00023-DMB (jtm) Modified on 7/1/2020 (jla).
|
|
Filing
227
JUDGMENT in favor of Ava Mitchell Tanner, Phyllis Fernandez against Alita Cheatham Mitchell, Craig Cheatham, DIRECTING Clerk to pay Ava Mitchell Tanner the amount of the annuities on deposit with the Court. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 3/31/20. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-00070-DMB, 3:18-cv-00023-DMB (jla)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER denying (192) Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Rhonda Gentry, M.D. in case 3:16-cv-00070-DMB-JMV; denying (66) in case 3:18-cv-00023-DMB-JMV. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/1/19. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-00070-DMB-JMV, 3:18-cv-00023-DMB-JMV (jtm)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/28/19. (bfg)
|
|
Filing
189
ORDER granting (185) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 3:16-cv-00070-DMB-JMV. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/25/19. Associated Cases: 3:18-cv-00023-NBB-RP, 3:16-cv-00070-DMB-JMV (tab)
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER granting 175 Motion to Stay; that the final judgment 173 is stayed pending appeal.. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/27/18. (tab)
|
|
Filing
173
FINAL JUDGMENT case dismissed re 170 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,,,. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/8/18. (tab)
|
|
Filing
170
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 126 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion for Summary Judgment; and that Summary Judgment on underlying interpleader action is granted in Ava's favor. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/2/18. (tab)
|
|
Filing
154
AMENDED ORDER re 153 Order on Motion to Intervene. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 12/12/17. (tab)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Intervene. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 8/18/17. (jtm)
|
|
Filing
137
RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT re 136 Order on Motion to Dismiss,, Order on Motion for Attorney Fees,. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 8/7/17. (tab)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part and deferred in part 67 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and deferred in part 67 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 11/29/16. (tab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
