Hardaway et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al
Paul Hardaway and Jacqueline Hardaway |
Litton Loan Servicing, LP, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and Rushmore Loan Management Services, Inc. |
3:2017cv00004 |
January 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Oxford Division Office |
De Soto |
Debra M. Brown |
Roy Percy |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 3001 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER denying 43 Motion for Relief From Judgment or Order; denying as moot 44 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 1/15/19. (jtm) |
Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion to Dismiss; granting 37 Motion to Dismiss; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 9/17/18. (jtm) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 Motion to Dismiss; to the extent Rushmore's motion includes a motion to strike, the motion to strike is denied as moot; denying 5 Motion to Dismiss; denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 15 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; that the time for the Hardaways to effect service of process is extended to 10/11/17; denying 18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 9/27/17. (tab) |
Filing 12 ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 3/20/17. (bnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.