Wilbourn v. Browning Arms Company
Plaintiff: James Wilbourn
Defendant: Browning Arms Company
Case Number: 3:2017cv00143
Filed: August 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Oxford Division Office
County: Quitman
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Presiding Judge: Jane M. Virden
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 7/3/18. (bfg)
March 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 3/14/18. (bfg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilbourn v. Browning Arms Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Wilbourn
Represented By: Erik S. Heninger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Browning Arms Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?