Hughes v. City Of Southaven, Mississippi et al
| Jessica Hughes |
| City Of Southaven, Mississippi, Steve Pirtle, DeSoto County, Mississippi, Bill Rasco, P. Croy and John Does 1-5 |
| 3:2018cv00044 |
| February 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| Grenada |
| Glen H. Davidson |
| Jane M. Virden |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 72 Order Granting Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 06/17/2019. (jwr)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/9/19. (ncb)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Any response to Plaintiff's second amended complaint that was stayed by operation of the District Judge's May 17 Order must be filed on or before December 31, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/12/18. (ncb)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 26 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 5/17/18. (tab)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/30/18. (ncb)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 9 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff shall have three (3) business days from this date to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/19/18. (ncb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
