Pearson v. State of Mississippi et al
| Marvin Pearson |
| State of Mississippi and Attorney General for the State of Mississippi |
| 3:2018cv00198 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Neal B Biggers |
| David A Sanders |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. (cr) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order, Set Deadlines Acknowledgment filed by Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, State of Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 5
ORDER, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi answer due 11/16/2018; State of Mississippi answer due 11/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 10/2/18. (cr)
|
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number MSN300022815 (tab) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 9/18/18. (cr) Modified on 10/1/2018 (tab).
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Neal B. Biggers and Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders. (cr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marvin Pearson. (cr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Tunica) filed by Marvin Pearson. (cr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
