Chhetri v. The University of Mississippi et al
| Arjun Paudel Chhetri |
| The University of Mississippi, Tracy Murry and Honey Ussery |
| 3:2019cv00135 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Neal B Biggers |
| Michael P Mills |
| Roy Percy |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Pro Se Address by Arjun Paudel Chhetri (jtm) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Pro Se Address by Arjun Paudel Chhetri (tab) |
| Filing 8 Correspondence from Arjun Paudel Chhetri. (jwr) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 Notice of Assignment. (jwr) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to The University of Mississippi. Delivered to US Marshal for Service. (edc) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Michael P. Mills recused. Case reassigned to Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 6/24/2019. (jla)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 6/24/19. (bnd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (tab) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arjun Paudel Chhetri. (tab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT,, filed by Arjun Paudel Chhetri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
