Probst v. Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff: Kenneth W. Probst
Defendant: Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv00237
Filed: October 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Michael P Mills
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2019 Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden: Case Management Conference held on 12/18/2019. (irw)
December 13, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Disclosure of Core Information by J. Cal Mayo, Jr on behalf of Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC to Counsel of Record. (Mayo, J.)
December 13, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Initial Disclosures by Sidney Ray Hill, III on behalf of Kenneth W. Probst to Defendant. (Hill, Sidney)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/4/19. (bfg)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Bobbi Britton Tucker is hereby admitted as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of the Defendant. Newly admitted counsel shall register as a user of the court's electronic filing system by November 25, 2019 at www.msnd.uscourts.gov/ecf. No further written order shall issue from the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/20/19. (bfg)(no document attached)
November 19, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; Attorney Bobbi Britton Tucker,(Paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number 0537-1741280) by Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Mayo, J.)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1: Case Management Conference set for 12/18/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/18/19. (irw)
November 18, 2019 Filing 5 CORPORATE STATEMENT Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC. (Mayo, J.)
November 18, 2019 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC. (Mayo, J.)
November 4, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sidney Ray Hill, III on behalf of Kenneth W. Probst Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC served on 10/29/2019. (Hill, Sidney)
October 25, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr)
October 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1732401, filed by Kenneth W. Probst. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jwr)
October 25, 2019 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jwr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Probst v. Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth W. Probst
Represented By: Sidney Ray Hill, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC
Represented By: J. Cal Mayo, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?