Bowlin et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
| 3:2020cv00105 |
| March 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MDL TRANSFER ORDER (Attachments: #1 Bard Docket Sheet (Main MDL Case), #2 Case Management Orders, #3 Daubert Orders, #4 Deposition Designation Orders, #5 Discovery and Privilege Orders, #6 Discovery Orders, #7 Master and Short-Form Pleadings, #8 Miscellaneous Orders, #9 Motions in Limine Orders) (jla) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE of Failure by Counsel to be Admitted to Practice Re: Annesley H DeGaris, Harold Turner McCall, Jr, Wendy R Fleishman (jla) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:19-cv-02824. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
| Remark - Case transferred to the Northern District of Mississippi via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.] |
Filing 7
SECOND AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD). See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/20/20. [Amending to Remove Case: Lisa Riley v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:18-cv-00896-NV from page 25 of Schedule B] (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.]
|
|
Filing 6
AMENDED ORDER - AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/6/20. (SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/4/20. (SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #3 Notice of Appearance/Association of Counsel filed by Kathy Bowlin. Document entered in wrong case. All documents must be filed in the lead case. **Note that there are TWO plaintiffs in this action and you have filed a notice of appearance for only one of them. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile document in correct case if you have not already done so. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) Modified on 10/28/2019 (SLQ). [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Wendy R Fleishman on behalf of Kathy Bowlin. (Fleishman, Wendy) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.] |
| Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell, with member case number: CV-19-02824-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16868463 filed by Kathy Bowlin, James Bowlin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 3/30/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bowlin et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
