Bass v. Cain et al
| Cortez Deontae Bass |
| Lynn Fitch, Nathan "Burl" Cain and Jesse Williams |
| 3:2020cv00260 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| David A Sanders |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
EXHIBIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I - 251-500, #2 Exhibit I - 501-750, #3 Exhibit I - 751-789) (jla)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number MSN300026545.), filed by Cortez Deontae Bass. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Judgment, #2 Exhibit B - Sentencing Judgment, #3 Exhibit C - Petition for Writ of Certiorari, #4 Exhibit D - Transcript of Sentencing Hearing 790-826, #5 Exhibit D - Transcript of Sentencing Hearing 827-863, #6 Exhibit E - Report of W. Criss Lott, Ph.D., #7 Exhibit F - Motion to Ensure Constitutional Sentencing Pursuant to Miller v. Alabama Including Jury Sentencing, #8 Exhibit G - Motion for Funds for Expert Assistance in the Field of Mitigation Investigation, #9 Exhibit H - Order Denying Motion for Funds for Expert in the Field of Mitigation Investigation) (jla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/17/2020: #10 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla).
|
|
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
