Shingles v. Rosenberg et al
Dave W. Shingles, Jr. |
City of Southaven, Mississippi and Brian Rosenberg |
3:2021cv00028 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Sharion Aycock |
Jane M Virden |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1: Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2021 at 11:00 AM via Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 3/26/2021. (irw) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Southaven, Mississippi, and Brian Rosenberg. (Huskison, Berkley) Modified on 3/29/2021 (jla). |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. City of Southaven, Mississippi's answer due 3/26/2021; Brian Rosenberg's answer due 3/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 3/16/21. (ncb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by City of Southaven, Mississippi, Brian Rosenberg. (Huskison, Berkley) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-1908323, filed by Dave W. Shingles, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jwr) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jwr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.