Turner v. State of Mississippi
Petitioner: Jeffory Chad Turner
Respondent: State of Mississippi
Case Number: 3:2021cv00235
Filed: November 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Michael P Mills
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by State of Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Special Traverse re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeffory Chad Turner. (cb)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 ORDER DIRECTING State to Respond. (cb)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 *RESTRICTED* State Court Record - Habeas by Respondent State of Mississippi. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (SCR), Cause No. 2017-KA-00972, Vol. 1, #2 SCR, Cause No. 2017-KA-00972 Vol. 2, #3 SCR, Cause No. 2017-KA-00972, Vol. 3, #4 SCR, Cause No. 2017-KA-00972, Case folder, #5 SCR, Cause No. 2017-KA-00972, Certiorari Folder, #6 SCR, Cause No. 2017-KA-00972, Exhibits, #7 SCR, Cause No. 2020-M-903) (Owens, Jerrolyn)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by State of Mississippi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Trial Verdict and Sentence), #2 Exhibit B (Decision of Miss Court of Appeals in Turner v. State, Cause No. 2017-KA-00972-COA), #3 Exhibit C (Cert Denied by Miss Supreme Court In Turner v. State, 2017-CT-00972), #4 Exhibit D (Motion for PCR filed by Jeffory Chad Turner), #5 Exhibit E (Order denying post-conviction in Turner v. State, Cause No. 2020-M-00903), #6 Exhibit F (Order denying rehearing in Turner v. State, Cause No. 2020-M-00903)) (Owens, Jerrolyn)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Order, Set Deadlines Acknowledgment filed by State of Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING State to Respond. State of Mississippi answer due 1/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/15/21. (cb)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number MSN300028325 (cb)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Virden. (cb)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DeSoto County), filed by Jeffory Chad Turner. (cb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. State of Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffory Chad Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Mississippi
Represented By: Jerrolyn M. Owens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?