Mathis v. United States of America et al
Peter Mathis, Jr. |
United States of America and M. Frink |
3:2022cv00016 |
January 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Oxford Division Office |
Neal B Biggers |
David A Sanders |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter/Correspondence from Peter Mathis, Jr. (cb) |
Filing 6 AMENDED / SUPPLEMENT TO DOCUMENT #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (cb) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number MSN300028600 (tab) |
Filing 5 Letter/Correspondence from Peter Mathis, Jr.. (cb) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 ORDER Requiring Petitioner to Submit an Amended Petition on the Proper Form; Also Requiring Petitioner to Either Pay the Filing Fee or Submit a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (cb) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Petitioner to Submit an Amended Petition on the Proper Form; Also Requiring Petitioner to Either Pay the Filing Fee or Submit a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 21 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 1/27/2022. (cb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Biggers and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (cb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Lafayette County), filed by Peter Mathis, Jr. (cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.