Jackson v. Shaw et al
| Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson |
| Cassandra Shaw, Andrew Sanders and Planters Bank |
| 3:2022cv00064 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Jane M Virden |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
REPLY to Response to Motion re #17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders. (Smith, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 23
Judicial Notice of Facts and Law (jwr)
|
|
Filing 22
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #21 Response in Opposition to #17 Motion, filed by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson. (jwr)
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (jwr)
|
|
Filing 20
CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Cassandra Shaw (jla)
|
|
Filing 19
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #15 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Planters Bank. (cb)
|
|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders. (Van Namen, Laura)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders. (Van Namen, Laura)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Laura Kathryn Van Namen on behalf of All Defendants (Van Namen, Laura)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Planters Bank answer due 6/10/2022; Andrew Sanders answer due 6/10/2022; Cassandra Shaw answer due 6/10/2022.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/1/22. (jla)
|
|
Filing 14
Plaintiff's REPLY in Opposition to Defendant's #5 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson. (jwr)
|
|
Filing 13
REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint filed by Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders, Cassandra Shaw. (Smith, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 12
Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Cassandra Shaw. (jla)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed Planters Bank served on 5/6/2022; Andrew Sanders served on 5/6/2022. (jla)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Caroline Baker Smith on behalf of Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders, Cassandra Shaw (Smith, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Constitutional Questions by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson (jla)
|
|
Filing 8
JUDICIAL NOTICE of Facts and Laws by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson (jla)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint filed by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson. (jla)
|
|
Filing 6
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Clerk's Notice of Incomplete Process as to all defendants. (jla)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders, Cassandra Shaw. (Smith, Caroline) Modified on 6/1/2022 (jla).
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to all defendants (jla)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Planters Bank, Andrew Sanders, Cassandra Shaw; returned to plaintiff for service. (jla)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 328795, filed by Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/25/2022: #3 Receipt) (jla).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
