Martin v. Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
Plaintiff: Andrew Martin
Defendant: Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv00176
Filed: August 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Oxford Division Office
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #7 Motion to Conduct Class Certification and Damages Discovery. Plaintiff shall have ninety (90) days from the date of this Order to conduct the discovery outlined above. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days after expiration of the discovery period to file a motion for class certification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/9/2022. (bbf)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 BRIEF re #9 Order requesting Supplemental Brief. (Ramsey, Michael)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Requiring Supplemental Briefing re #7 MOTION Leave to Conduct Class Certification and Damages Discovery. Supplemental briefing required by November 17, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/7/2022. (bbf)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #7 MOTION Leave to Conduct Class Certification and Damages Discovery filed by Andrew Martin. (Ramsey, Michael)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION Leave to Conduct Class Certification and Damages Discovery by Andrew Martin. (Ramsey, Michael)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC (jla)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Entry of Default by Andrew Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Entry of Default) (Ramsey, Michael)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael T. Ramsey on behalf of Andrew Martin Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC served on 9/19/2022. (Ramsey, Michael)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC (jla)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC; emailed to Attorney for service. (jla)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2131761, filed by Andrew Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Martin
Represented By: Michael T. Ramsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?