Franks v. City of Oxford, Mississippi et al
| Renika Franks |
| City of Oxford, Mississippi and Oxford Housing Authority |
| 3:2022cv00194 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Roy Percy |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand by Oxford Housing Authority. (Allen, R.) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Mitchell O. Driskell, III and J. Rhea Tannehill, Jr terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 11/1/2022. (yf)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Conference: Case Management Conference reset for 12/5/2022 11:00 AM in Oxford Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (rtc) |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney J. Rhea Tannehill, Jr. and Mitchell O. Driskell, III, by Oxford Housing Authority. (Hallmark, John) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Oxford Housing Authority answer due 11/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 10/31/2022. (yf)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Cody Hallmark on behalf of Oxford Housing Authority (Hallmark, John) |
| Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Oxford Housing Authority. (Allen, R.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Rhea Tannehill, Jr on behalf of Oxford Housing Authority (Tannehill, J.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mitchell O. Driskell, III on behalf of Oxford Housing Authority (Driskell, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2022 11:00 AM in Oxford Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 10/5/22. (rtc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mallory Kaye Bland on behalf of City of Oxford, Mississippi (Bland, Mallory) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gregory Todd Butler on behalf of City of Oxford, Mississippi (Butler, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; City of Oxford, Mississippi waiver sent on 10/4/2022. (Waide, Jim) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jim D. Waide, III on behalf of Renika Franks Oxford Housing Authority served on 9/28/2022. (Waide, Jim) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Defendant City of Oxford, Mississippi, c/o Todd Butler, Esq. (per request) on 10/4/2022 by Jim D. Waide, III on behalf of Renika Franks. Waiver of Service due by 11/3/2022. (Waide, Jim) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City of Oxford, Mississippi, Oxford Housing Authority; emailed to Attorney for service. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2139731, filed by Renika Franks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Contract for Supplemental Police Services, #2 Exhibit B - Oxford Police Department General Order 8.10, #3 Exhibit C - EEOC Charge No. 490-2022-00543, #4 Exhibit D - Amended EEOC Charge No. 490-2022-00543, #5 Exhibit E - Right to Sue Letter for EEOC Charge No. 490-2022-00543, #6 Exhibit F - EEOC Charge No. 490-2022-00668, #7 Exhibit G - Right to Sue Letter for EEOC Charge No. 490-2022-00668, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
