Scott v. Protective Insurance Company et al
Robert Scott |
Protective Insurance Company, Big M Transportation, Inc., XYZ Unknown Corporations and John Does A-D |
3:2022cv00214 |
October 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Debra M Brown |
Roy Percy |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Robert Scott. (Pittman, Steven) |
Filing 13 CORPORATE STATEMENT Big M Transportation, Inc.'s Disclosure of Corporate Ownership and Affiliation. (Berry, Michael) |
CLERK'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION re #9 MOTION for Disclosure of Corporate Ownership and Affiliation; Incorrect event chosen; Please refile using the event Corporate Statement. (jla) |
Filing 12 NOTICE Cancelling Case Management Conference set for 11/29/22 re #11 Order Staying Case (no document attached) (rtc) |
Filing 11 ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 11/4/2022. (yf) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gregory Weathers Virden, Jr on behalf of Big M Transportation, Inc. (Virden, Gregory) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Disclosure of Corporate Ownership and Affiliation by Big M Transportation, Inc.. (Berry, Michael) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Big M Transportation, Inc.. (Berry, Michael) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Big M Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint) (Berry, Michael) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to State Court Complaint by Protective Insurance Company. (Culp, H.) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE STATEMENT of Protective Insurance Company. (Culp, H.) |
Filing 4 STATE COURT RECORD - REMOVAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons Issued to Big M Transportation, Inc., #3 Exhibit C - Summons Issued to Protective Insurance Company, #4 Exhibit D - Summons Returned Executed to Protective Insurance Company, #5 Exhibit E - Summons Returned Executed to Big M Transportation, Inc., #6 Exhibit F - Notice of Removal to Federal Court) (Culp, H.) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 11/29/2022 11:00 AM in Oxford Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 10/6/22. (rtc) |
Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (jla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Protective Insurance Company from Tippah County Circuit Court, case number CV2022-148 KES. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSNDC-2152284) Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 5(b) and the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing for the Northern District of Mississippi, the removing defendant must electronically file a copy of the entire state court record within 14 days of the date of removal. The state court record will be filed using the event State Court Record - Removal. Attach the Notice/Certificate of Filing State Court Record as the main document with each state court document attached as a separate PDF. All attachments must be clearly identified. The state court record can not be filed conventionally., filed by Protective Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.