Gardner v. Panola County, Mississipppi et al
| James M. Gardner |
| Panola County, Mississipppi, Tate County Mississippi and Mississippi Department of Corrections |
| 3:2023cv00051 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Jane M Virden |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
*RESTRICTED* State Court Record - Habeas by Respondents Mississippi Department of Corrections, Tate County Mississippi, Panola County, Mississipppi. (Attachments: #1 SCR, Panola County Circuit Court Cause No. CR-2018-0148-JMP2, #2 SCR, Panola County Circuit Court Cause No. CR-2021-81-SMP1) (Owens, Jerrolyn)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Mississippi Department of Corrections, Panola County, Mississipppi, Tate County Mississippi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Petition to Enter Plea and Plea Hearing Transcript), #2 Exhibit B (Sentencing Orders), #3 Exhibit C (Petition to Revoke Post-Release Supervision), #4 Exhibit D (Revocation Hearing Transcript), #5 Exhibit E (Order Revoking Post-Release Supervision), #6 Exhibit F (Negotiated Order to Remand and Criminal Disposition)) (Owens, Jerrolyn)
|
|
Filing 7
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #6 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis Acknowledgment filed by Mississippi Department of Corrections, Panola County, Mississipppi, Tate County Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn) Modified on 3/29/2023 (jwr).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, directing State to Respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 3/14/2023. (tab)
|
|
SET ANSWER Deadlines: Mississippi Department of Corrections answer due 3/31/2023; Panola County, Mississipppi answer due 3/31/2023; Tate County Mississippi answer due 3/31/2023. (tab)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge Jane M Virden. (tab)
|
|
Filing 4
Case transferred in from District of Mississippi Southern; Case Number 3:23-cv-00138. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITIONERS CIVIL ACTION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2254 TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 3/7/2023 (cwl) [Transferred from Mississippi Southern on 3/9/2023.]
|
|
District Transfer Out to the District of Northern District of Mississippi (cwl) [Transferred from Mississippi Southern on 3/9/2023.]
|
|
Remark No Number: Order transferring case emailed to IT Department to electronically transfer case. (cwl) [Transferred from Mississippi Southern on 3/9/2023.]
|
|
Filing 2
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Gardner. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PG) Modified on 2/24/2023 (VM). [Transferred from Mississippi Southern on 3/9/2023.] Modified on 3/9/2023 (tab).
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James Gardner ( Panola County). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Various Documents, #2 Exhibit 2 - Various Documents, #3 Exhibit 3 - Various Documents, #4 Notice of Assignment, #5 Envelope)(PG) Modified on 2/24/2023 (VM). [Transferred from Mississippi Southern on 3/9/2023.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
