Winding v. McClure et al
| James C. Winding |
| Marc McClure and Attorney General of State of Mississippi |
| 3:2023cv00071 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Roy Percy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRANSFERRED CASE opened SDMS as 5:23-CV-029, filed 4/21/2023 re #6 Order (tab) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re Case Transferred Out to Another District. (tab) |
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CAUSE to Southern District of Mississippi. Signed by Senior Judge Michael P. Mills on 3/21/2023. (tab)
|
| Case Transferred to SDMS. Transferred electronically via CM/ECF. CASE CLOSED. (tab) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (tab) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Requests for Admission for Defendant(s) Admit or Deny by James C. Winding. (tab) |
| Filing 3 MOTION For Plaintiff to Show Cause/Request De Novo as to Why Court Should Allow Him to Proceed With Habeas Corpus after Sanction by James C. Winding. (tab) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by James C. Winding. (tab) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James C. Winding. (Attachments: #1 Appendix C) (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
