Alsuwaylimi v. Blinken et al
Abdulmohsen Alasmar O Alsuwaylimi |
Antony Blinken and Michael Ratney |
3:2023cv00392 |
October 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Debra M Brown |
Jane M Virden |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Antony Blinken and Michael Ratney (jla) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants,, filed by Abdulmohsen Alasmar O Alsuwaylimi. (Riches, Brandon) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Attorney Christopher M. Casazza. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/17/23. (jla) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; Attorney Christopher Casazza,(Paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number AMSNDC-2318390) by Abdulmohsen Alasmar O Alsuwaylimi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Riches, Brandon) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Michael Ratney, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Counsel is instructed to download and print for service. (jla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2308394, filed by Abdulmohsen Alasmar O Alsuwaylimi. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit A-Q, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.