Rockette v. The City of Water Valley MS et al
| Terry Rockette |
| The City of Water Valley MS, The Carpenter Management Company, Berkshire Apartment and Daniel Martin |
| 3:2023cv00407 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Glen H Davidson |
| Jane M Virden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice and to Respond to the R&R by Terry Rockette. (lgm) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/15/23. (jla)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS #4 and denying #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Terry Rockette. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 12/12/2023. (lgm)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Terry Rockette Objections to R&R due by 11/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/14/2023. (lgm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Virden. (lgm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Rockette. (lgm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, filed by Terry Rockette. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lgm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
