Rainey v. Gipson
| Vinita Rainey |
| Sharon D. Gipson |
| 3:2023cv00458 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Debra M Brown |
| Roy Percy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TEXT NOTICE Cancelling Case Management Conference set for 2/14/24 re #12 Order Staying Case (no document atttached) (rtc) |
Filing 12
ORDER STAYING CASE DUE TO IMMUNITY MOTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/24/24. (bnd)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Sharon D. Gipson. (Perry, John) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Sharon D. Gipson. (Perry, John) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Sharon D. Gipson. (Perry, John) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 2/14/2024 10:00 AM in Oxford Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/8/24. (rtc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/3/24. (bnd)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Garrett Tyjuan Estes on behalf of Sharon D. Gipson (Estes, Garrett) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Sharon D. Gipson. (Perry, John) Modified on 1/26/2024 (jla). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Keith Perry, Jr on behalf of Sharon D. Gipson (Perry, John) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jim D. Waide, III on behalf of Vinita Rainey Sharon D. Gipson served on 12/18/2023. (Waide, Jim) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Sharon D. Gipson answer due 1/23/2024. (bnd) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Sharon D. Gipson (jla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Sharon D. Gipson. Counsel is instructed to download and print for service. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2328123, filed by Vinita Rainey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Criminal Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B - Disposition of Justice Court Case, #3 Exhibit C - Article Entitled Gipson Loses Claim Against Employee, #4 Exhibit D - Plaintiff's Medical Records, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rainey v. Gipson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vinita Rainey | |
| Represented By: | Jim D. Waide, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sharon D. Gipson | |
| Represented By: | John Keith Perry, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Garrett Tyjuan Estes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
