Callaham v. Quality Farm & Auto, Inc. et al
Roy Callaham |
Quality Farm & Auto, Inc. and Batesville Quality Auto Parts Inc. |
3:2024cv00016 |
January 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Michael P Mills |
Roy Percy |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re #6 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Roy Callaham. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Michael P. Mills on 2/9/2024. (spw) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal . (Norris, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Louis H Watson, Jr on behalf of Roy Callaham Batesville Quality Auto Parts Inc. served on 1/23/2024. (Watson, Louis) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Louis H Watson, Jr on behalf of Roy Callaham Quality Farm & Auto, Inc. served on 1/23/2024. (Watson, Louis) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert N. Norris on behalf of Roy Callaham (Norris, Robert) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel is instructed to download and print for service. (jwr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMSNDC-2341682, filed by Roy Callaham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jwr) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jwr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.