Barber v. McKesson Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Toya Barber
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Marcellus Wordlow and Darrell Anderson
Case Number: 3:2024cv00069
Filed: March 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Michael P Mills
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) McKesson Corporation answer due 6/24/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 5/14/2024. (jla) Modified on 5/16/2024 (lgm).
May 14, 2024 Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) by McKesson Corporation. (Baker, Tammy) Modified on 5/14/2024 (jla).
May 2, 2024 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; Marcellus Wordlow waiver sent on 5/2/2024. (Watson, Louis)
May 2, 2024 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; Darrell Anderson waiver sent on 5/2/2024. (Watson, Louis)
April 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint McKesson Corporation answer due 5/15/2024.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/22/24. (jla)
April 22, 2024 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by McKesson Corporation. (Baker, Tammy) Modified on 4/22/2024 (jla).
March 26, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Louis H Watson, Jr on behalf of Toya Barber (Watson, Louis)
March 25, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Darrell Anderson, McKesson Corporation, Marcellus Wordlow. Counsel is instructed to download and print for service. (jla)
March 25, 2024 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla)
March 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMSNDC-2370215, filed by Toya Barber. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber v. McKesson Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toya Barber
Represented By: Louis H Watson, Jr
Represented By: Robert N. Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKesson Corporation
Represented By: Tammy L. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcellus Wordlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrell Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?