Gardley-Starks v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
| Lirlene Gardley-Starks |
| Pfizer, Inc., Wyeth, LLC, Schwarz Pharma, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Northstar RX, LLC, ESI Lederle, Inc., PLIVA, Inc. and Actavis Elizabeth, LLC |
| 4:2010cv00099 |
| August 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Humphreys |
| W. Allen Pepper |
| David A. Sanders |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
261
ORDER denying 255 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 255 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 9/26/2013. (psk)
|
|
Filing
192
ORDER denying 169 Motion to Strike. Signed by Jane M Virden on 1/28/2013. (sef)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 177 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 1/10/2013. (sba)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER denying 149 Motion to Stay. Signed by Jane M Virden on 12/19/2012. (sef)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 124 Motion to Stay. Signed by Jane M Virden on 7/26/2012. (sef)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Stay. Should the Supreme Court fail to render a decision before August 3, 2011, a case management conference will be held on that date. Signed by David A. Sanders on 2/28/11. (ncb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
