Crawford v. Epps et al
| Charles Ray Crawford |
| Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee, James Brewer, Lee Simon, Nathan Harris, Eddie Cates, James Griffin, Sarrah Pittman, Kim Nagel, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., American Correctional Associations, Margaret Winter and ACLU National Prison Project |
| 4:2012cv00038 |
| May 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Sunflower |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| Michael P. Mills |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 9/4/15. (jtm)
|
|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT - Report and Recommendation 21 APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court; defendants Nagel, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., the American Corrections Association, Margaret Winter and the ACLU National Prison Project are DISMISSED with prejudice; claims against Christopher Epps, E.L. Sparkman, Warden Earnest Lee, Former Warden James Brewer, Lee Simon, Corrections Supervisor Nathan Harris, Hearing Officer Eddie Gates, Hearing Officer James Griffin, Hearing Officer Sarah Pittman, and Lt. Earnest King will PROCEED. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 5/16/14. (cr)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 18 Judgment. Signed by Michael P. Mills on 7/3/13. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
