Burton v. Colvin

Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Antonio Eugene Burton
Case Number: 4:2013cv00054
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Greenville Division Office
County: Bolivar
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 10, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Jane M Virden on 12/10/13. (ncb)
September 10, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Antonio Eugene Burton against Social Security Administration Commissioner c/o General Counsel. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Jane M Virden on 9/10/13. (ncb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burton v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Eugene Burton
Represented By: Emily-Ruth Smathers Ratliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?