Molinar v. Cabe

Plaintiff: Raul Waters Molinar
Defendant: Lorenzo Cabe
Case Number: 4:2013cv00178
Filed: October 10, 2013
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Greenville Division Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Neal B. Biggers
Referring Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 20, 2014 16 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT - ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 . Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED; Report and Recommendation APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court; case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim counting as a STRIKE. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 5/19/14. (cr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Molinar v. Cabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raul Waters Molinar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lorenzo Cabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.