Bradley (DO NOT FILE) v. Epps et al
Mondric Bradley (DO NOT FILE) |
Christopher B. Epps, Malcom McMillian, Kay Washington and Robert Sterlin |
4:2014cv00013 |
January 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Greenville Division Office |
Sunflower |
Debra M. Brown |
Jane M Virden |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER denying 43 Motion for Release from Custody; Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why any future submissions, other than those necessary for appeal, should not be docketed as correspondence with 21 days. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 8/30/21. (jla) |
Filing 38 ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/9/20. (jla) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION that pauper status REVOKED; prior order granting in forma pauperis WITHDRAWN re 16 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 9/23/15. (tab) |
Filing 15 ORDER that motion to alter or amend judgment is GRANTED; the Clerk is directed to REINSTATE case to active docket; and REINSTATE motion to proceed in forma pauperis re 14 USCA Judgment. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 3/30/15. (tab) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 5 Final Judgment. Signed by Debra M. Brown on 4/10/14. (cr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.