Riggins v. City of Indianola, Mississippi et al
Plaintiff: Denice Riggins
Defendant: City of Indianola, Mississippi, Steve Rosenthal, Jane Evans, Richard O'Bannon and John Does 1-5
Case Number: 4:2014cv00110
Filed: July 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Greenville Division Office
County: Sunflower
Presiding Judge: Debra M. Brown
Presiding Judge: Jane M. Virden
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion for Summary Judgment and that case is remanded to Circuit Court of Sunflower County MS. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/25/16. (tab)
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 AMENDED ORDER re 57 Order on Motion to Continue. Trial continued until 8/8/2016.. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 10/14/15. (jtm)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 9/22/15. (th)
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 3/2/15. (ncb)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 2/17/15. (ncb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riggins v. City of Indianola, Mississippi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denice Riggins
Represented By: Stephanie N. Morris
Represented By: Thomas Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Indianola, Mississippi
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Rosenthal
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Evans
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard O'Bannon
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?