McCray v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
| Otis Oliver McCray |
| Mississippi Department of Corrections, Paxton Paige, H. Williamson, Woods and Bernice Brown |
| 4:2017cv00115 |
| August 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Marshall |
| Debra M. Brown |
| Roy Percy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Motions 26 , 57 , 60 , 63 are GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/17/18. (cr)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 4/16/18. (cr)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 48 Motion to withdraw magistrate judge consent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 2/20/18. (cr)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 23 Motion for Advancement of Funds. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 11/30/17. (jla)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Claim against Bernice Brown is DISMISSED with prejudice; claim against MCCF is dismissed; claim against MDOC, Dr. Paige, H.S.A.H. Williamson, and Dr. Woods will proceed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 11/9/17. (cr)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 7 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 8/8/17. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
