Salley et al v. Webster County, Mississippi et al
Plaintiff: Robert Salley and Bonita Cunningham
Defendant: Webster County, Mississippi, Tim Mitchell, Dillon Cates and Blake Love
Case Number: 4:2018cv00066
Filed: March 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Greenville Division Office
County: Grenada
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Presiding Judge: Jane M. Virden
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss; denying 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 2/21/2019. (lpm)
April 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Stay. The instant motion is GRANTED in part pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 16(b)(3)(B), and those proceedings specifically enumerated in the local rule are hereby STAYED. The motion is denied, however, to the extent it seeks permission to conduct discovery related to the immunity and abstention issues because no bases for entitlement to the same have been established. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/20/18. (ncb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salley et al v. Webster County, Mississippi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Salley
Represented By: Carlos Eugene Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonita Cunningham
Represented By: Carlos Eugene Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Webster County, Mississippi
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Represented By: Mary McKay Lasker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Mitchell
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Represented By: Mary McKay Lasker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon Cates
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Represented By: Mary McKay Lasker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blake Love
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Represented By: Mary McKay Lasker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?