Dunigan v. Mississippi Valley State University et al
| Chinna Dunigan |
| Mississippi Valley State University and Renardo Hall |
| 4:2019cv00033 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Debra M Brown |
| Jane M Virden |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Mississippi Valley State University. (jwr)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Entry of Default as to Defendant MVSU by Chinna Dunigan. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit 1: Attorney declaration, #2 Summons 2: Executed summons) (Dillard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joel Frank Dillard on behalf of Chinna Dunigan Mississippi Valley State University served on 3/18/2019. (Dillard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Mississippi Valley State University and Renardo Hall (jla)
|
|
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Debra M Brown and Magistrate Judge Jane M Virden. (tab)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Renardo Hall, Mississippi Valley State University. E-mailed to attorney for service. (tab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1649371, filed by Chinna Dunigan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
