Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
| Kacy Fonteze Williams |
| State of Mississippi and Attorney General Jim Hood |
| 4:2019cv00095 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Debra M Brown |
| David A Sanders |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #5 Order, Set Deadlines, Terminate Motions, #6 Acknowledgment of Service. (cr) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number MSN300024278 (tab) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #5 Order, Set Deadlines, Terminate Motions, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Acknowledgment filed by Jim Hood, State of Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING STATE TO RESPOND; Jim Hood answer due 10/1/2019; State of Mississippi answer due 10/1/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 6/20/19. (cr) Modified on 7/23/2019 (jla).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla) (jla). |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kacy Fonteze Williams. (jla) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kacy Fonteze Williams. (jla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Leflore), filed by Kacy Fonteze Williams. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
